Whether or not the types suggest straightforwardly constrained solitary intercourse types or androgynous, blended areas of the body, every thing in Paradox of Pleasure talks if you ask me regarding the radical human anatomy politics of cyberpunk energy, intercourse, and physical physical violence.
That churning anima of desire places it together with H.R. GigerвЂ™s famous 1973 artwork Penis Landscape (aka вЂњWork 219: Landscape XXвЂќ). But unlike GigerвЂ™s alien visual, FernandezвЂ™s success is really a reinvention of romanticism, where in fact the performative in addition to seem that is ingenious connected. A lot more to the level, FernandezвЂ™s paintings that are foreboding in the chopped body looks well-liked by Robert Gober and Paul Thek, specially ThekвЂ™s technical Reliquaries series, including Meat Piece with Warhol Brillo BoxвЂќ (1965). Like these musicians, Fernandez generally seems to take comfort in an inventiveness which can be morally negligent, gnarly, brooding, sad, eccentric, and emotionally going in an easy method that is maddeningly difficult to explain without mentioning brutality that is cold. It’s not for absolutely absolutely nothing any particular one of their paintings, вЂњDГ©veloppement dвЂ™un dГ©lireвЂќ (growth of a delusion,вЂќ 1961) which will be maybe maybe not in this show had been showcased into the 1980 Brian de Palma film Dressed to destroy (a film beloved by particular designers for the Metropolitan Museum of Art scene, lushly scored by Pino Donaggio).
Agustin Fernandez, вЂњUntitledвЂќ (1997), oil on canvas, 103 x 132 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Daniel Pype) Agustin Fernandez, вЂњLe Roi et la ReineвЂќ (вЂњThe King as well as the Queen,вЂќ sexcamly.es 1960), drawing in some recoverable format, 175 x 122 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Farzad Owrang)
Aesthetically, FernandezвЂ™s paintings of armored, pansexual closeness produce a vivid psycho geography that may be a bit lumbering in quite similar means as Wifredo LamвЂ™s, Roberto MattaвЂ™s, and AndrГ© MassonвЂ™s mystical paintings. Nevertheless, this can be a thing that FernandezвЂ™s drawings, like вЂњLe Roi et la ReineвЂќ (вЂњThe King therefore the Queen,вЂќ1960) which calls in your thoughts Marcel DuchampвЂ™s painting that is famous Roi et la Reine entourГ©s de Nus vitesвЂќ (вЂњThe King and Queen enclosed by Swift Nudes,вЂќ 1912) have the ability to avoid.
But in both mediums, along with in their collages (like theвЂњMalcom that is startling X 1982), you will find complicated identifications going on that blur organic with inorganic kinds.
Duchamp first made mention of the device cГ©libataire (bachelor machine) device in a 1913 note printed in preparation for his piece вЂњLa mariГ©e mise Г nu par ses cГ©libataires, mГЄmeвЂќ (вЂњThe Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even,вЂќ 1915вЂ“23), which accentuates psychological devices that work away in the imaginary, deconstructing the Hegelian tradition of intimate distinction founded being a dialectical and natural opposition of masculine and feminine. FernandezвЂ™s sex that is enigmatic bondage, which probes the shameless vagaries of individual desire with Duchampian panache, is definitely an indirect outgrowth regarding the arriГЁre garde, male dominant French Surrealist preferences demonstrated when you look at the 1959 Eros event organized by AndrГ© Breton and Duchamp in Paris. But it addittionally recommends an even more modern, tautly eroticized and flesh that is virtualized banking institutions on a hyper sexed, electronic corporeality this is certainly synthetic, bionic, and prosthetic essentially an updated expansion for the re territorialization of body, identification, and appearance depicted early into the feverish cyborg looks of Oskar Schlemmer and Fernand LГ©ger.
As perversely droll and symptomatic I could not help but also view the nasty permissiveness of Paradox of Pleasure in the bright light of artistic misogyny that shines from Kate MillettвЂ™s seminal 1970 study Sexual Politics through to todayвЂ™s #TimesUp movement as it is to experience the rhapsody of FernandezвЂ™s loveless and lopsided sadomasochistic cybernetic pleasures playing within the male mystique. Inside the many alluring compositions, Fernandez imagines the effective castration for the privileged male musician in relationship to your manipulated feminine human anatomy. Therein lies the paradox that is pleasurable. Agustin Fernandez, вЂњUntitledвЂќ (1976), drawing in writing, 74 x 56 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Farzad Owrang) Agustin Fernandez, вЂњMalcom XвЂќ (1982), collage, 91.7 cm x 64.5 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Daniel Pype)